1Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517 (1925); Ex parte Hiester, 572 S.W.2d 300 (Tex. 1978); Ridgway v. Baker, 720 F.2d 1409 (5th Cir. 1983)
2 Tex. Fam. Code § 157.163(a)
3 Tex. Fam. Code § 157.163(b)
4 Ex parte Gunther, 758 S.W.2d 226 (Tex. 1988)
5 In re Luebe, 983 S.W.2d 889 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding)
6 Tex. Fam. Code § 157.163(f), (g)
7 See Ex parte Hiester, 572 S.W.2d 300 (Tex. 1978)
8 Ex parte Hamill, 718 S.W.2d 78 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1986, orig. proceeding)
9 Muniz v. Hoffman, 422 U.S. 454 (1975)
10 Ex parte Werblud, 536 S.W.2d 542 (Tex. 1976).
11 See Ex parte Werblud, 536 S.W.2d 542 (Tex. 1976)
12 See Ex parte Werblud, 536 S.W.2d 542 (Tex. 1976) ($1,000 fine held petty; no right to jury); Ex parte Griffin, 682 S.W.2d 261 (Tex. 1984) ($104,000 fine, $500 for each of 208 separate violations, held to be serious; entitled to a jury).
13 See Ex parte Griffin, 682 S.W.2d 261 (Tex. 1984).
14 Ex parte Griffin, 682 S.W.2d 261 (Tex. 1984); Ex parte Suter, 920 S.W.2d 685 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st District] 1995, orig. proceeding).
15 Tex. Fam. Code § 157.161
16 Tex. Gov’t Code § 52.046.
17 Ex parte Chambers, 898 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. 1995); Ex parte Carson, 641 S.W.2d 537 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982).
18 Travelhost, Inc. vs. Blandford, 68 F.3d 958 (5th Circuit 1995)
19 Tex. Fam. Code § 157.005(b)
20 Ex parte Werblud, 536 S.W.2d 542 (Tex. 1976). 
21 Ex parte York, 899 S.W.2d 47 (Tex. App.—Waco 1995, orig. proceeding).
22 Ex parte Tankersley, 650 S.W.2d 550 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1983, orig. proceeding).
23 Ex parte Snow, 677 S.W.2d 147 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, orig. proceeding)

24 Ex parte Payne, 598 S.W.2d 312 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana 1980, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Brown, 574 S.W.2d 618 (Tex. Civ. App.—Waco 1978, orig. proceeding).
25 U.S. vs. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993);  Ex parte Busby, 921 S.W.2d 389 (Tex. App.—Austin 1996, orig. proceeding).
26 Dixon, 509 U.S. at 696, Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932).
27 Ex parte Jones, 36 S.W.3d 139 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, orig. proceeding).
28 In Ex parte Englutt, 619 S.W.2d 279 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana 1981, orig. proceeding), the first contempt was a criminal contempt and he served his time and thereafter a coercive contempt was commenced. Further, additional child support became due in the period following his criminal non-support conviction and adjudication. The Court found that double jeopardy did not bar the second contempt proceeding.
29 See Ex parte Rosser, 899 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, orig. proceeding) for an analysis of the inability to comply defense in visitation cases.
30 See Ex parte Chambers, 898 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. 1995).
31 Ex parte DeWees, 210 S.W.2d 145 (Tex. 1948); Ex parte Hart, 524 S.W.2d 365 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1975, orig. proceeding).
32 Ex parte Ramzy, 424 S.W.2d 220 (Tex. 1968); Ex parte Rohleder, 424 S.W.2d 891 (Tex. 1967); Ex parte Townsley, 297 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. 1956).
33 Ex parte Barnes, 730 S.W.2d 46 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1987, orig. proceeding).
34 Tex. Fam. Code § 157.167.
35 Ex parte Helms, 259 S.W.2d 184 (Tex. 1953); Ex parte Chacon, 607 S.W.2d 317 (Tex. Civ. App.—El Paso 1980, orig. proceeding).
36 IMMO Moers, 104 S.W.3d 609 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no. pet.); see Tex. Const. Art. I, § 18
37 IMMO Moers, 104 S.W.3d 609  (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).
38 Ex parte Rosser, 899 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, orig. proceeding).
39 Tex. Fam. Code § 9.014.
40 Wallace v. Briggs, 348 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. 1961).