Background Image
Previous Page  30 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

30

(Endnotes)

1 Richard Orsinger is a Partner with the firm Orsinger, Nelson, Downing & Anderson in Dallas. He is Board Certified in Family Law

& Civil Appellate Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

2 In re Burris, 136 U.S. 586 (1890) (“The whole subject of domestic relations of husband and wife, parent and child, belongs

to the laws of the States and not to the laws of the United States”); Ohio ex rel. Popovici v. Agler, 280 U.S. 379 (1930) (“when the

Constitution was adopted the common understanding was that the domestic relations of husband and wife and parent and child

were matters reserved to the States”).

3 Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972).

4 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S.Ct. 2652 (2013).

5 Id. (Chief Justice Roberts voting in the majority, with Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Sotomayor dissenting).

6 U.S. v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), 133 S.Ct. 2675 (June 26, 2013).

7 Herbert v. Kitchen, 755 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2014).

8 Bostic v. Schaefer, No. 14-1167, 4th Cir. (July 28, 2014).

9 Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2014).

10 Latta v. Otter, 771 F.3d 456 (9th Cir. 2014).

11 DeBoer v. Schneider, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014).

12 De Leon v. Perry, No. 5:13-CV-00982-OLG (Texas law invalidated).

13 Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant, 773 F.3d 55 (5th Cir. 2014) (Mississippi law invalidated).

14 Robicheaux v. Caldwell, 2 F.Supp.3d 910 (2014) (Louisiana law upheld).

15 Brenner v. Armstrong, No. 14-14061, 11th Cir. (Dec. 3, 2014).

16 Orsinger, Richard. (2015, Jan. 27). Same-Sex Marriages and Gender Identity Issues. Paper presented at the 2015 Family Justice

Conference, San Antonio, available at

https://www.yourhonor.com/myprofile/assets/ORSINGER_Same-Sex_Marriages_Gender_

Identity_Issues_2015_(1-20-2014_-_2).pdf.

17 Id.

18 Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 124, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

19 Ross v. Goldstein, 203 S.W.3d 508, 514 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

20 Mireles v. Mireles, 2009 WL 884815, at *2 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 2, 2009, pet. denied) (mem. op.).

21 In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 326 S.W.3d 654, 658-59 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2010, pet. granted).

22 326 S.W.3d at 667.

23 326 S.W.3d at 665.

24 State v. Naylor, 330 S.W.3d 434 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

25 330 S.W.3d at 441.

26 Petition for Review of State of Texas

http://wwww.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/ebriefs/11/11011401.pdf.

27 Opinion No. JC-0156, Re: Whether a county clerk must accept for filing a “declaration of domestic partnership”

<https://www

.

texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/opinions/49cornyn/op/1999/htm/jc0156.htm>

28 Ross v. Goldstein, 203 S.W.3d 508, 514 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

29 The Texas ACLU submission in support of the trial court’s action is at

<http://aclutx.org/download/119

>.